I've had a few people throw the following reference at me when doing workshops, basically saying the en-ROADS model is likely to be completely wrong. It's to detailed on climate science for me to respond effectively and wondered if you had any comments.

https://medium.com/science-and-philosophy/ninety-nine-percent-of-all-conversations-about-climate-are-wrong-fa56d3f4f828

Thanks

I haven't looked carefully but here is an old link to check out:

https://blog.hotwhopper.com/2015/10/more-of-david-siegels-climate-lies-and.html

Thanks, Ernest. 

I found this also 

https://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2015/10/29/climate-change-is-real-and-important-david-siegel

https://medium.com/@miriamob/climate-change-is-real-and-important-646b663adcf#.vp3l4iba0

I am trying to understand the motivation behind this kind of denial. Any Ideas?

Thanks for the link, really takes apart his thesis.

Motivation a task for the psychologists. Same with Q anon stuff I suppose.