Given climate progress in the past 10 years (especially shift away from coal), is Business As Usual less bad than we thought? More like 3C in 2100? That's the question asked in this week's Nature comment paper by Hausfather and Peters, "Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading"? [And that's an argument they've been floating increasingly over the past few months]

It's getting attention on #ClimateTwitter, other media like EENews ClimateWire, Climate Nexus, Axios. Assume it'll be raised in our events. So, how should En-ROADS Ambassadors respond to participant questions about it? 

We should make sure that the slide on temperature impact is really strong so that people can decide for themselves...